As August approaches, teachers will begin a new school year and their “step” will increase by another year. That “step” is the number of years served in schools. Not long ago, teachers who served the state for at least ten years would receive what was called “longevity” pay as part of their commitment to public schools. In fact, all full-time state employees receive this – or did.
Teachers no longer get it.
In the long session of 2014, the NC General Assembly raised salaries for teachers in certain experience brackets that allowed them to say that an “average” salary for teachers was increased by over 7%. They called it a “historic raise.”
However, if you divided the amount of money used in these “historic” raises by the number of teachers who “received” them, it would probably amount to about $270 per teacher.
That historic raise was funded in part by eliminating teachers’ longevity pay.
Similar to an annual bonus, this is something that all state employees in North Carolina — except, now, for teachers — gain as a reward for continued service. The budget rolled that money into teachers’ salaries and labeled it as a raise.
That’s like me stealing money out of your wallet and then presenting it to you as a gift. And remember that teachers are the only state employees who do not receive longevity pay.
Just teachers. Personally, that’s thousands of dollars that have been taken away from me by North Carolina.
It’s almost like the North Carolina General Assembly doesn’t even want to have teachers be considered employees of the state.
This summer will be the eight summer that veteran teachers will not receive longevity pay. For the many veteran teachers who have never really seen a raise in the past 7-8 years in actual dollars, the loss of longevity pay actually created a loss of net income on a yearly basis.
New teachers entering the profession in North Carolina have seen the removal of graduate degree pay bumps and due-process rights. While the “average” salary increases have been most friendly to newer teachers (financed in part by removal of longevity), those pay “increases” do plateau at about Year 15 in a teacher’s career. Afterwards, nothing really happens. Teachers in that position may have to make career-ending decisions.
The removal of longevity might make those decisions easier to make on a personal level, but more difficult for the state to recover from.
Longevity pay does mean that much to veteran teachers. It also means a lot to the NCGA because they used its elimination to help wage a systematic war against veteran teachers.
Veteran teachers fight for schools, for students, for fairness in funding, and for the profession. When they act as a cohesive group, they represent an entity that scares the current leaders of the North Carolina General Assembly like nothing else.
3 thoughts on “Remember Longevity Pay? It’s Now Over Eight Years That Teachers Have Been Denied.”
Indeed. After 33 years I retired because of all the BS. They owe me about $20k for all those years taken.
When you take into account the loss of longevity pay then the top of the teaching scale is essentially the same as it was 15 years ago. That’s a 42% decrease in pay. While teaching in 2008, the majority of NC taxpayers believed that we were underpaid. What do they think now?
This surely seems like N.C. teachers have the basis for a class action lawsuit. Not only does it affect teachers yearly but it has an impact on retirement earnings… Since 2009 the NCGA has been trying to push veteran teachers out of the profession.. 😡
Comments are closed.