Don’t Believe the Hype About NCTEACHERRAISE.COM – It Was BS Back Then and Even More So Now

“We need people to judge us on what we’ve done.”

– Dallas Woodhouse, NC GOP Executive Director on May 15th, 2018 (

Alright, that’s exactly what I will do.

In that same report by Greg Childress of The Herald-Sun, Woodhouse talked about his party rolling out an new “application” in May 16th “that will allow teachers and others to accurately check teacher pay.”

That application is called


Put in your years and away we go! I have 20 in my career.


Looks good, if you are into glitzy numbers. But look at the small print:

This chart compares only state funded base teacher pay and does not account for other pay that generally increased overall teacher pay, including: longevity, performance bonuses, supplemental pay for National Board Certification and advanced degrees, local teacher supplements – which can be as much as an additional 24.5% of state base teacher pay, and a robust benefits package worth an average of $23,629.37 per teacher per year.

Does not account for longevity? Of course not. That was taken away and then put back into teacher’s pay checks as part of the historic 2014 teacher raise that did not in fact go to each teacher.

Performance bonuses? Those only go to a small number of teachers and even that is not weighted well.

Advanced degrees? The same GOP that made this table took those away from new teachers in 2014.

Robust benefits package worth an average of $23,629.37? Like the average salary figure of over 50K that the GOP claims NC teachers are making, this acts the same. As long as veteran teachers who are grandfathered into salaries that honor graduate degrees, then there will be a higher benefits average pension-wise. The figure given by the site is also too high to sustain with the new salary schedule that will no longer have teachers making over 52K at the most when they reach 25+ years of teaching. Besides, most teachers are paying more for insurance.

And local teacher supplements? That means that the GOP is using local supplements to boost their own “cooked” numbers in average salary overall when they are actually forcing local LEA’s to burden the cost of so much. Remember the class size mandate?

But the most glaring inconsistencies about this site is that it never mentions two important factors: The GREAT RECESSION and ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.

Look at this nice graph:



This site is actually using the effects of the GREAT RECESSION as a part of their argument. It’s as if they are blaming the fact that revenues for the state dipped so low because of a national financial crisis caused by Wall Street on the democrats who in a biannually created budget made the projections for 2013-2014 a year or two previous.

And there is no place on this site to calculate inflation. But don’t worry, that’s been done thanks to the North Carolina Justice Center and the venerable Kris Nordstrom.


Tells a completely different story. It would be nice if Dallas Woodhouse could rebut those figures with this “new application.”

But there is another falsehood surrounding Woodhouse said it was new. It’s not. It was used in the last election to spread the same kind of false narrative. There is a post on this blog that addressed it from May of 2016.

Here’s what it said:

A website appeared on the landscape this week that adds even more shade to an already shady proposition. Here is the home page for Notice it has the red, white, and blue of the American Flag or the colors of the new “America” Beer once known as Budweiser.


A few questions/concerns pop into my head when first looking at this patriotic website. The first is the banner at the top, “Attracting Excellent Teachers. Building Excellent Public Schools.” Nothing could be more antithetical to the truth.

In reality, it should say, “Spurning Excellent Teachers. Razing Excellent Public Schools.” Why? Because the very same NC GOP party that created this website also has done or enabled the following in the last three years:

  • Allowed teacher pay to continue to drop when adjusted for inflation(

  • Removed due process rights for new teachers to keep them from advocating loudly for students and schools.

  • Removed graduate degree pay bumps for teachers entering the profession.

  • Instituted a Value Added Measurement system and Standard 6, an amorphous and unproven way to measure teacher effectiveness.

  • Pushed for merit pay when no evidence exists that it works.

  • Attacks on teacher advocacy groups like NCAE.

  • Created a revolving door of standardized tests that do not measure student growth.

  • Lowered the amount of money spent per pupil in the state.

  • Removed class size caps.

  • Instituted a Jeb Bush style school grading system that is unfair and does nothing more than show how poverty affects public schools.

  • Created an uncontrolled and unregulated system of vouchers called Opportunity Grants.

  • Fostered charter school growth that has not improved the educational landscape and siphons money from the public school system.

  • Created failing virtual schools outsourced to private industry.

  • Allowed for an Achievement School District to be considered for legislation.

  • Eliminated the Teaching Fellows Program.

  • Created an atmosphere of disrespect for teachers that teaching candidate numbers in colleges and universities have dropped 30%.

The second and more glaring aspect of this website is the need for anyone to have to place a name, email, and zip code in the fields in order to get any information – information that should not have any strings attached to it in order to access it.

Why would anyone have to give personal information to hear about this? Well, I did with generic information. The zip code is the one for the NC General Assembly.


And I got this.


And this…


The first chart with the line graph simply says that a teacher in North Carolina will get to the maximum salary within 15 years of experience. But it is interesting to see how the proposed 2017-2018 salary looks inviting.

THAT’S BECAUSE ALL OF THE OTHER ONES ARE THAT BAD. When you have nothing to look at except horrible options and then you present an option that is a little less horrible, that last option will really stick out as amazing to many people. But it isn’t.

It still shows that the highest amount of salary a new teacher will ever make is 50,000. That’s terrible. As one sees his/her children grow and want to go to college, the amount of money being netted still amounts to the same. Not many teachers will appreciate making the same amount of money in year 30 as he/she did in year 15. And it totally negates that there is no longer longevity pay for veteran teachers, and no longer advanced degree pay or due process rights for new teachers.

Furthermore, it’s just a proposal. A fictitious line in the sand.

The second screen shot highlights some spun numbers and explanations of those numbers. Allow me to translate the information.

  1. $54,224 – New teacher average salary (including local supplements). This number is putting into account current teachers who do still have advanced degree pay and due process rights. They will retire first if they do not change professions. If the proposal shown in the first table is to go into effect, the average will go down over time as the top salary would be 50,000 for those who just entered or will enter the teaching profession. It’s hard to have an average salary over the highest amount given for a salary.

  2. $9,234 – Average teacher raise since 2013. First it shows how bad salaries were, but this number is truly aided by the fact that most of the raises since 2013 were for newer teachers. Veteran teachers like myself did not receive those raises. Teachers who are just starting out got them. And it does not count graduate degree pay that many veteran teachers receive in order to help them stay in the profession. Oh, and longevity pay? Gone, as teachers no longer get that. And there is also that word, “average,” which so many times does not even equate to “actual”.

  3. #1 – Projected teacher pay ranking in the southeast. I would imagine that other states have seen the lesson shown in NC that the NCGA has not learned yet. And that is other states will also keep raising teacher salaries to keep their schools filled. And there is another word used like “average” – it is “projected.” I will believe it when I see it.

  4. #24 – Projected teacher pay ranking in the nation. Remember those historic raises from 2013 that were supposed to launch us to the middle of the pack in the nation on teacher pay? That projection did not happen. We went from 42nd to …………….41st.

  5. 15 – Number of years it will take to earn a $50,000 salary. Number of years it will take after 15 years to make more than $50,000? Eternity.

  6. 33 – Number of years it took to reach $50,000 under the Democrats’ plan. Well, you have me there. No actually you don’t. Are we referring to the plan of the “Democrats” right before the Great Recession or right after it happened? Either way, the “Democrats’ plan” had longevity pay, due-process rights, advanced degree pay bumps, and kept the health benefits at a steady pace. Adding in those factors and you might see why teaching as a career in North Carolina back before 2013 was much more inviting than it is now.

  7. $198,650 – A teacher’s additional pay over a 30-year career. Again, misleading. First, the $50,000 salary cap at year 15 is designed to make sure that veteran teachers do not stay in the profession. Secondly, this projection is not taking into account that the current retirement system may change. Look at all of the changes that have occurred in only the last three years. Imagine what might be planned for the next thirty.


It was BS back then. It’s even more so now.




That Email Dallas Woodhouse Sent to NC Boards of Elections Was Not The Best of Moves

When you want to do something surreptitiously, it’s probably best not to email your intentions for others to see and forward to the press.

It’s like hiding that “Peace Frog” tattoo you got on your lower back when you and your fraternity brothers got really drunk one night, but you still went to work without even putting a shirt on.

It’s like being a 32-year-old “kid” who dyed his hair, swam really fast, got a medal, got drunk, and pissed on the side of a wall and tore down a sign but claimed that he was being robbed – all the while the whole thing was on video.

It’s like trying to circumvent the law or a ruling by a higher court by sending an email with very explicit instructions on how to break the law by not really observing it and then sending that email out to people who believe that their oath to the law is stronger than partisan politics.

That first example is just a scenario, but I do know many people with unintended tattoos. There’s even a show about it – Bad Ink.

The second example concerns Ryan Lochte’s recent Olympic-sized blunder in which he actually displayed his arrogance and right of privilege in a world too much filled with double-standards. The court of public opinion will be a harsh judge on that on.

The third example actually happened this past week with Dallas Woodhouse, the executive director of the N.C. Republican Party.

Just check out this excerpt from the Raleigh News & Observer from a report given by Colin Campbell. ( A copy of the full email can be found here –

NCGOP executive director Dallas Woodhouse emailed the request to Republican county board members and other party members on Sunday. The News & Observer obtained copies of the emails through a public records request.

County elections boards are developing new early voting schedules in response to a federal court ruling that threw out the state’s voter ID law. In addition to revoking North Carolina’s photo ID requirement, the ruling requires counties to offer 17 days of early voting….

“Our Republican Board members should feel empowered to make legal changes to early voting plans, that are supported by Republicans,” Woodhouse wrote in his email to board members. “Republicans can and should make party line changes to early voting.”

Woodhouse made statements like,

“We believe same-day registration is ripe with voter fraud, or the opportunity to commit it. Same-day registration is only available during early voting. We are under no obligation to offer more opportunities for voter fraud.”

“Many of our folks are angry and are opposed to Sunday voting for a host of reasons including respect for voter’s religious preferences, protection of our families and allowing the fine election staff a day off, rather than forcing them to work days on end without time off. Six days of voting in one week is enough. Period.”

“No group of people are entitled to their own early voting site, including college students, who already have more voting options than most other citizens.”

Wow! I don’t know what is more egregious – the fact that he literally instructed boards of elections across the state to disobey the court’s orders or that he thought he was powerful enough to send thi in an email and totally not expect to be caught Read more here: .

If you have not read the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reasoning for the repealing of the Voter ID Law, then do it. You can find it here –

They pretty much said that the Voter ID law was passed to specifically limit votes by minorities and poorer people. It was a sharp indictment against the GOP-led NC General Assembly and Gov. McCrory.

But Woodhouse did this? Whether or not a law was broken is up for the courts and people above my pay grade, but what it really shows me is one very, very strong motivating factor driving Mr. Woodhouse.

That is FEAR.

What separates the North Carolina of 2012 (and to a lesser degree, 2014) from the North Carolina of 2016 is a huge influx of new voters. NC is growing fast and many of these new North Carolinians are moving in because of the change in the economy – from rural manufacturing and agriculture to urban and suburban banking, finance, technology, and other 21st century “industries”. And these people are not necessarily die-hard republicans. Charlotte is much bigger. The Triad area (Winston-Salem, Greensboro, High Point) and the Triangle (Chapel Hill, Durham, Raleigh) areas are growing. Even Asheville is growing. They also have major public college campuses.

These new Old North Staters may see HB2, the Voter ID law, the Duke Energy coal ash spills, and other legislative initiatives as backwards and regressive. And they may want to do something about it.

Furthermore, there is a “YUGE” presidential election. There is no doubt that Donald Trump is a polarizing figure. So is Clinton. But I do not see democratic heavyweights not supporting their candidate. That is not the case for republicans. Many top members have openly said they would not vote for Trump. Now, if you are a Richard Burr, or Pat McCrory, or any state lawmaker who is running for reelection as a republican, you must make a choice, and an openly vocal one, to either support or not support Trump.

Deciding to support him has repercussions. Deciding not to support him has repercussions. Not making an open decision has repercussions. The only thing that some of these people could hope for is to not have more democratic leaning people vote. Repealing the Voter ID law allows such people to vote.

Hence, Woodhouse’s email.

It does make one scratch his head to think of how unintelligent sending an email like that could be. It will fall into someone’s inbox who views it as an attempt to bypass laws, and the press will obtain a copy of it – the very same press that many in the GOP rail against.

Furthermore, Woodhouse did all but guarantee that the board of elections in each county will be under a little more scrutiny, or at least have more hypervigilant eyes upon them. When they were instructed to “make things easier for the republicans” and that was made public, you simply placed a large media target on the process.

Hell, it may ensure that more people come to the polls.

Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, But Your Words Will Never… Wait, What The Hell Did You Say? – Or, The Truitt, Woodhouse, and Diaz Show

This past Wednesday, a group of 14 North Carolina educators were arrested as part of a demonstration that ended up as a “sit-in” on a busy Raleigh road.

As reported, a larger group of educators started a two-day march from Durham to the capitol building on Tuesday (

The march was planned to build awareness to what organizers believe are unfit learning environments for North Carolina students.

About 50 or more teachers, school counselors, parents and students say their plans are endorsed by the North Carolina NAACP and Forward Together Moral March. The march started in Neal Middle School in Durham and also from Wakefield High School in Raleigh.

The group reached the capitol around 5 p.m. and began knocking on the building’s doors.

After not getting an answer, the group began to march on downtown streets, blocking them.

Needless to say that was a busy intersection. And it got the attention of a lot of news outlets, which is part of the reason for having the demonstration.

Fourteen teachers/educators were arrested. I am unsure of what will come from their arrests, but to many they just became heroes for their schools and for their students. Simply put, it takes guts to do what they did. Their students and communities will look at them and see them fighting for them.

I have met some of those teachers in that demonstration. They work in tough schools. They know what is happening all too well. They are good people. I would want my kids as their students.

Some people will no doubt say they went too far, were demanding attention from the governor on too short of notice, and were acting selfishly in stopping innocent people from getting home during rush hour. We can talk about that for a long time, maybe while we are stuck in traffic.

Yet it was the reactions from McCrory’s staff that made me realize why having demonstrations for public schools like this are very important. BECAUSE IT PUTS THE DIALOGUE ABOUT SCHOOLS IN THE PUBLIC’S EAR!

Three specific people stood out in this standoff (aside from McCrory), and their words and lack of actions show the disconnect that people in office have when it comes to the governor and the General Assembly’s actions concerning public schools.

First, there was Catherine Truitt, the Senior Education Advisor for McCrory. She offered to meet with the demonstrators and maybe they should have taken her offer, but she is really another shill for the GOP mainstays. One of the reasons that the demonstrators were wanting to meet with McCrory was because of the per pupil expenditures that have gone down in the past three years.

She was quoted as saying by (,

“We are doing a great job of educating our students and 57 percent of our general fund goes right into education in North Carolina, which is higher than the national average.

One needs to take that comment in context. Mrs. Truitt wrote a much uninformed op-ed for this past March where she “explains” how the governor has been very pro-public education. You should read it (

I wrote her a letter back and posted it on this blog after not receiving an answer from her. It remains the second most viewed item on out of over 70 postings.

Her quote about the 57 percent was the very same item she bragged about in that op-ed. She seemed to forget that our state’s constitution actually stipulates that we spend that much for public education. In fact, that percentage was higher before the governor took office under other republican governors. You may read my response to her here with all of the sources cited. (

But remember, Mrs. Truitt has a job to do. She is speaking on behalf of a politician. Yet, I doubt she read any responses to he claims earlier which might be the reason she keep making the same uninformed claims.

Secondly, there was Dallas Woodhouse, the NCGOP Executive Director. He was quoted as saying in the WNCN report,

“What a bizarre group of union activists, blocking traffic and getting arrested to apparently protest Governor McCrory on raising teacher pay more than any other state over the last three years.”

Union activists? There is no union in NC, Mr. Woodhouse. You want to see union activists? Go to Chicago. Those are unions. In fact, those union activists have shut down one of the biggest school districts in the nation overnight. That’s power. But it is interesting that the very people you claim are union activists whom the NCGOP called “hardly newsworthy” became very much the night’s news.

Another point that Mr. Woodhouse brought up was the “raising teacher pay more than anyone else over the last three years.”

What he is referring to is that “average” teacher pay in North Carolina was increased by putting most raises in the hands of beginning teachers and not veteran teachers. He forgot to delineate between average teacher pay and actual teacher pay.

And the operative word here is “average.” Beginning teachers saw an average pay hike of over ten percent, yet the more years a teacher had, the less of a “raise” was given. The result was an AVERAGE hike of 6.9 percent, but it was not an even distribution. In fact, some veterans saw a reduction in annual pay because much of the “raise” was funded with what used to be longevity pay. And as a teacher who has been in North Carolina for these past ten years, I can with certainty tell you that my salary has not increased by 6.9 percent.

Also according to the most recent NEA report there is not much “growth” in NC’s educational condition. We are 48th in Percentage Change in Average Salaries of Public School Teachers 2004-2005 to 2014-2015 (-10.2) – Table C-14.

Furthermore, those raises in teacher pay included the elimination of longevity pay which all public sector employees receive, EXCEPT TEACHERS. What really happened was that the NCGA took money from the pockets of educators and then presented back to them in the form of a raise all the while promoting it as a commitment to teachers. It’s like robbing someone and then buying them a gift with the stolen money and keeping the change.

Like Mrs. Truitt, Mr. Woodhouse is reciting practiced half-truths like he is paid to do.

An old friend, Mr. Ricky Diaz, was also referenced in the WNCN report.

Following the arrests, McCrory campaign spokesman Ricky Diaz issued a statement that called the demonstrators “union-funded campaign surrogates.”

“Not only did this demonstration inconvenience drivers, it wasted law enforcement resources during rush hour,” Diaz said in a release. “If Roy Cooper is in charge of enforcing the law in North Carolina, why would he send his campaign surrogates to break it?”

Diaz is the campaign spokesperson for McCrory’s reelection campaign.

Remember him? He was the 24-year old former spokesman for the DHHS in NC under Dr. Aldona Wos. He received a substantial raise soon after taking the job. He was making over $80,000 to be a spokesperson in what turned out to be one of the most disastrous DHHS administrations in recent history. When that raise was brought to light, he resigned to pursue a job in Washington D.C.

And here he is again getting paid to say weird things probably for a substantial salary.

According to Diaz’s quote, Roy Cooper is coercing the non-existent NC teacher’s union to fund demonstrators who eventually block traffic? The same demonstrators who were “hardly newsworthy”? Interestingly enough, Mr. Diaz used Cooper’s name more than his boss’s name in the report.

But now I see why he commands that big salary. He has to speak for the governor, who never speaks to any group that questions him.

Did the governor defend HB2 to the LGBT community face to face? No. Did he go to his hometown as the former four-term moderate mayor to explain why HB2 struck down their local ordinance? No. Did the governor defend his lack of action against Duke Energy in the wake of the coal ash spills to the people who were affected most? No. Did the governor defend those who were seeking more explicit explanation on how fracking could hurt rural environments? No. Has the governor ever actually addressed the North Carolina Association of Educators? No.

Did the governor respond to the demonstrators’ request for a meeting when an invitation was extended well before the actual march began in order to give him time to accept or decline formally? No.

Rather, he has others explain his actions or lack thereof. And all Mrs. Truitt, Mr. Woodhouse, and Mr. Diaz did was make the arrests of these 14 educators that much more important and newsworthy. Their non-answers prove that the questions raised by the demonstrators actually need to still be answered and that someone has to take responsibility.

Gov. McCrory should be willing to meet with the demonstrators. He needs to explain his actions. As a man who actually went to college to study to become a teacher, the governor should be very willing to talk to teachers and other educators about the state of schools.

But until then, the governor and those who “voice” his answers are just being roadblocks in the process of delivering a quality education to all North Carolina students.

And in Raleigh, creating a roadblock gets you arrested.

Or unelected.