About Those “Teacher Pay Facts” Shared At The NCGA On May 1st By Certain Lawmakers

A website appeared on the political landscape in 2016 that still continues to expand the Phil Berger education propaganda machine, and it was used to tout erroneous talking points for many a legislator yesterday  in the halls of the Legislative Building on West Jones Street.

If you made it inside of the building and had the opportunity to talk with some of the lawmakers, there were many fliers and posters placed around for people to see and take for reference. And that information is on this site.

Here is the home page for www.ncteacherraise.com. Notice it has the red, white, and blue of the American Flag, but mostly red.

teacherpay2

A few questions/concerns arise when first looking at this patriotic website. The first is the banner at the top, “The Truth About NC’s Rising Teacher Salaries.” Nothing could be more antithetical to the truth. Why? Because the very same NC GOP party that created this website also has done or enabled the following in the last eight years:

  • Removed due process rights for new teachers to keep them from advocating loudly for students and schools.
  • Removed graduate degree pay bumps for teachers entering the profession.
  • Instituted a Value Added Measurement system which are amorphous and unproven way to measure teacher effectiveness.
  • Pushed for merit pay when no evidence exists that it works.
  • Attacks on teacher advocacy groups like NCAE.
  • Created a revolving door of standardized tests that do not measure student growth.
  • Lowered the amount of money spent per pupil in the state when adjusted for inflation.
  • Removed class size caps.
  • Instituted a Jeb Bush style school grading system that is unfair and does nothing more than show how poverty affects public schools.
  • Created an uncontrolled and unregulated system of vouchers called Opportunity Grants.
  • Fostered charter school growth that has not improved the educational landscape and siphons money from the public school system.
  • Created failing virtual schools outsourced to private industry.
  • Allowed for an Innovation School District to be constructed.
  • Eliminated the Teaching Fellows Program and brought it back as a former shell of itself.
  • Created an atmosphere of disrespect for teachers that teaching candidate numbers in colleges and universities have dropped over 30%.

Look at the fine print at the bottom of that initial screen shot.

berger 2

It says, “This chart compares only state funded base teacher pay and does not account for other pay that generally increased overall teacher pay, including: longevity, performance bonuses, supplemental pay for National Board Certification and advanced degrees, local teacher supplements – which can be as much as an additional 24.5% of state base teacher pay, and a robust benefits package worth an average of $23,629.37 per teacher per year.

Read that fine print closely. Because it is spin.

  • WE DO NOT HAVE LONGEVITY ANY LONGER.
  • WE DO NOT OFFER ADVANCED DEGREE PAY TO TEACHERS HIRED AFTER 2014.
  • NOT ALL SYSTEMS OFFER LOCAL TEACHER SUPPLEMENTS. AND THE GOP IN RALEIGH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LOCAL SUPPLEMENTS! 
  • “AN ADDITIONAL %24.5?” of BASE PAY? IS THAT DIFFERENT FROM THE SALARY TOUTED BELOW?

Further along this website you see these:

teacherpay

And this…

teacherpay3

The first chart with the line graph simply says that a teacher in North Carolina will get to the near maximum salary within 15 years of experience. So, what would veteran teachers have to look forward to after year 15? Not much.

It still shows that the highest amount of salary a new teacher will ever make is @ 53,000. That’s terrible. As one sees his/her children grow and want to go to college, the amount of money being netted still amounts to the same. Not many teachers will appreciate making almost the same amount of money in year 30 as he/she did in year 15. And it totally negates that there is no longer longevity pay for veteran teachers, and no longer advanced degree pay or due process rights for new teachers.

And it is comparing it to a plan that was made YEARS AGO.

The second screen shot highlights some spun numbers and explanations of those numbers. Allow for some translation of the information.

  1. $53,975 – Teacher average salary (including local supplements). This number is putting into account current teachers who do still have advanced degree pay and due process rights. They will retire first if they do not change professions. If the proposal shown in the first table is to go into effect, the average will go down over time as the top salary would be 54,000 for those who just entered or will enter the teaching profession. It’s hard to have an average salary over the highest amount given for a salary.
  2. 5 – Number of consecutive teacher pay raises. Not for all. Refer to graph below for #6.
  3. #3 – Fastest Rising Teacher Salaries in U.S. This is true in the sense of “average”, but those raises have heavily been on the front end of the teacher scale. That means fewer dollars can affect a greater change in the percentage of pay increases. And Tim Moore recently admitted that previous pay raises have been for beginning teachers (look at his quote below).
  4. $8,600 – Average teacher raise since 2013. First it shows how bad salaries were, but this number is truly aided by the fact that most of the raises since 2013 were for newer teachers. Teachers who are just starting out got them. And it does not count graduate degree pay that many veteran teachers receive in order to help them stay in the profession. Oh, and longevity pay? Gone, as teachers no longer get that. And there is also that word, “average,” which so many times does not even equate to “actual”.
  5. %19 – Average percentage pay increase since 2013.That is the most recycled, spun statement used by West Jones Street concerning public education in the last five years. And it barely has validity. Why? Because this fastest growing teacher income designation is only true when it pertains to “average.” It does not mean “actual.” Again, those raises Berger refers to were funded in part by eliminating teachers’ longevity pay. Like an annual bonus, all state employees receive it—except, now, for teachers—as a reward for continued service. Yet the budget he mentions simply rolled that longevity money into teachers’ salaries and labeled it as a raise.
  6. $237,200 – Increase in lifetime earning potential of a North Carolina teacher since 2013. Misleading. First, the $54,000 salary cap is designed to make sure that veteran teachers do not stay in the profession. Secondly, this projection is not taking into account that the current retirement system may change. Look at all of the changes that have occurred in only the last six years. Imagine what might be planned for the next thirty. Oh, no longevity pay. If Berger wants to make that claim, then he needs to explain this as well:
    1
  7. #2 – Ranked Teacher Pay in the Southeast. Again, that’s skewed, especially since the new salary schedule is really comparing base pay for teachers who only have a Bachelor’s degree. Other states in the Southeast give graduate pay increases. In fact, there are some states in the country that have requirements that teachers have Masters Degrees. Maybe looking at the average teacher pay for those who have a Master’s Degree in the Southeast would be interesting to see.

    teacherpay5
    Now consider that North Carolina will not have this level of pay because there no longer is advanced degree pay for teachers hired after 2014. That might change that ranking.

  8. % 9.5 – Percentage pay increase that Governor Cooper vetoed. Actually, Gov. Cooper vetoed the entire budget, probably because lawmakers in power refused to listen to debate and hear amendments and passed the budget through a “nuclear” option. Cooper’s plan called for raises to be more evenly distributed across experience levels.

There’s also a graphic with links about how past budgets have raised teacher pay>

teacherpay4

Remember, that’s an “average” teacher raise heavily given to the lower rungs of the salary schedule. Even Tim Moore said it.

Moore said that previous pay plans focused on teachers earlier in their careers because lawmakers were hearing from the state Department of Public Instruction that those were the ones most likely to leave their jobs. Now, things have changed, he said.

“Now we want to go back and do more for our veteran teachers,” said Moore. 

What change was he referring to? Veteran leaving were leaving the profession at a higher rate? Makes one wonder why.

Now go back to the original screen shot at the beginning.

teacherpay2

A success story? Not.

Spun propaganda? Yes.